Cloud resilience vendors ranked for 2026: who rebuilds infrastructure, not only data
Short answer
Firefly ranks first (73.5 out of 100) because it restores cloud configuration, networking, identity and DNS as Terraform code and keeps a full change history. Arpio (71.1) and Commvault Cloud Rewind (70.7) are close behind and beat Firefly on recovery automation, data protection and, for Arpio, published pricing. Most teams will pair an infrastructure recovery tool with a data backup product such as Veeam or Cohesity.
Ranking current as of September 2026 · By the Cloud Resilience Vendors research desk
Best for application rebuild inside a Commvault estate
70.7 / 100
Which cloud resilience platforms rebuild infrastructure after an incident?
A backup gets your data back. It does not recreate the VPC, the security groups, the IAM roles, the DNS records and the hundreds of settings your application needs before that data is useful. This ranking scores eight products on that second job: rebuilding cloud infrastructure and configuration after ransomware, an outage, an accidental deletion or a bad automated change. Two of the eight are data backup platforms, scored because buyers compare them. Two are infrastructure-as-code tools, included as the baseline most teams already own.
Seven criteria, weighted by how much each one decides a rebuild. Scores are 0 to 100 and the total is computed from the published weights. A filled square marks the top score in each column.
Cloud resilience vendor scores, edition 2026.09. Column codes are the seven criteria with their weights.
Editorial assessment, 0-100 per criterion. Weighted total = sum of (score × weight) / 100. It measures fit for rebuilding cloud infrastructure and configuration after an incident. It is not a measure of overall product quality: data backup platforms and IaC orchestration tools score lower here because they solve a different part of the problem.
Infrastructure coverage beyond data86: Docs list backup coverage for 190 AWS resource types across 48 services and 86 Azure resource types across 14 services, including IAM, Route 53, VPC, security groups, EKS and AKS; GCP is not in the coverage table.
Recovery automation84: Backup policies run on demand, daily, weekly or monthly and capture dependencies automatically; restore is a guided Terraform flow rather than a single failover button.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild82: Firefly documents cross-region and cross-account rebuild, including into a clean, isolated region or account after ransomware.
Drift and change history92: Drift detection, mutation logs and a configuration history are core product features, not add-ons.
Restore as code (IaC generation)94: Restores are generated as Terraform code, and codification covers Terraform, Pulumi and CloudFormation, so the recovered state is code the team keeps.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record30: Firefly states that data backup is not service continuity and does not document backing up database or volume contents; it needs a data backup product alongside it.
Pricing transparency55: Essential is published at $2,499 a month billed annually, but Backup and DR sits in the Enterprise tier, which is custom priced.
Arpio
Infrastructure coverage beyond data72: Replicates infrastructure and data with dependency mapping on AWS and Azure; a full list of covered resource types is not published on the pages we reviewed.
Recovery automation90: One-click testing and failover in every tier, automated failback in Premium, and orchestrated ransomware recovery in Enterprise.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild90: Cross-account and cross-region failover on AWS and cross-subscription orchestration on Azure are stated on the home page.
Drift and change history35: Drift detection and a configuration change history are not published.
Restore as code (IaC generation)25: Arpio does not publish infrastructure-as-code output from a recovery.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record78: Continuous replication with RPOs as low as 15 minutes in Standard and real-time RPOs in Premium.
Pricing transparency90: All three tiers are on the pricing page, with Standard at $12k single-cloud and Premium at $36k single-cloud per year.
Commvault Cloud Rewind
Infrastructure coverage beyond data84: Covers compute, storage, networking, databases and security on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud; the G2 description adds containers, Kubernetes clusters, security groups and load balancers.
Recovery automation88: Automated point-in-time capture and one-step recovery of multi-layer application stacks are the core of the product.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild78: Restores to the production VPC or to isolated recovery environments; cross-account steps are not detailed on the product page.
Drift and change history50: Point-in-time copies give a history, but drift detection against a known-good state is not published.
Restore as code (IaC generation)60: Commvault says recovery environments are programmed with IaC, while marketing the product as a way to skip IaC; a Terraform export is not published.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record80: Captures in-sync copies of workloads including data, backed by a vendor that has sold backup since 1996.
Pricing transparency25: No public price; available through the AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplaces, otherwise Contact sales.
ControlMonkey
Infrastructure coverage beyond data86: Daily snapshots of cloud configuration on AWS, Azure and GCP plus SaaS configuration for Okta, Entra ID, Cloudflare, Cisco Meraki and Zscaler.
Recovery automation76: A time-machine restore to a known-good state; the recovery speed claim (85% faster) is a customer figure without an RTO.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild70: Secondary region replication is listed in the Pro tier; cross-account rebuild is not detailed.
Drift and change history88: Drift detection with granular alerting and a ClickOps scanner are core features.
Restore as code (IaC generation)85: Discovers resources that are not in code and generates Terraform for them.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record20: Configuration only; ControlMonkey does not position itself as a data backup product.
Pricing transparency45: A free resilience assessment is published with limits; Pro and Enterprise are Contact sales.
Cohesity
Infrastructure coverage beyond data55: Cloud Rebuild restores infrastructure, configurations and data, but only for select AWS workloads in Terraform-provisioned environments.
Recovery automation70: Recovery orchestration (RecoveryAgent) and an isolated recovery environment in AWS; infrastructure rebuild depends on existing IaC definitions.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild65: Cross-region recovery and an isolated recovery environment in AWS are stated; cross-account detail is not published.
Drift and change history30: Drift detection and a configuration change history are not published.
Restore as code (IaC generation)55: Uses your validated IaC definitions as the source of truth rather than generating new code.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record92: Broad data protection for EC2, RDS and S3 in self-managed or managed form, a clean room for investigation, and the combined Cohesity and Veritas business since December 2024.
Pricing transparency20: No public price; Contact sales.
Veeam
Infrastructure coverage beyond data35: Protects Amazon VPC and Azure Virtual Networks among its listed services, but configuration-level detail is not published; the product is built around workload data.
Recovery automation62: Recovery orchestration is part of the Veeam Data Platform Premium tier; infrastructure rebuild is not the focus.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild60: Veeam Backup for Google Cloud states recovery across regions and projects; the AWS and Azure pages do not detail cross-region rebuild.
Drift and change history15: No drift detection or configuration change history.
Restore as code (IaC generation)10: No infrastructure-as-code output.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record94: The widest listed data coverage in this ranking (EC2, EBS, RDS, Aurora, DynamoDB, Redshift, EFS, FSx, S3, Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, Cloud SQL, Spanner) with always-immutable backups.
Pricing transparency70: The SaaS offering is published at $42 per TB per month; software pricing varies.
HCP Terraform
Infrastructure coverage beyond data40: Can only rebuild what is already written in Terraform; resources created by hand or by other tools are outside its reach.
Recovery automation45: Re-running a workspace can rebuild infrastructure, but there is no recovery workflow, dependency capture or failover.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild50: Code can be pointed at another region or account, which the team has to design and test itself.
Drift and change history80: Health assessments detect drift and run continuous validation, in the Standard and Premium editions only.
Restore as code (IaC generation)30: Stores code and state history with a UI rollback of state, but does not generate code from existing resources.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record5: No data protection.
Pricing transparency60: Pay-as-you-go with a $500 credit is published; per-resource rates sit in an IBM pricing table.
StackGuardian
Infrastructure coverage beyond data30: Discovers unmanaged resources on AWS, Azure and GCP, but has no backup or recovery product.
Recovery automation35: Workflow orchestration exists for provisioning; there is no recovery workflow.
Cross-region and cross-account rebuild30: Not published as a recovery capability.
Drift and change history80: Continuous drift detection with audit reports.
Restore as code (IaC generation)85: Codifies unmanaged resources into Terraform or OpenTofu.
Data protection depth and cloud DR track record5: No data protection.
Pricing transparency50: A free tier with no credit card is published; enterprise plans are Contact sales.
What does each vendor restore: data, configuration, network, identity, DNS?
The recovery scope matrix shows what each vendor's public material says it restores across five layers. It is built from vendor pages and documentation reviewed in September 2026, not from testing. Download it as CSV.
An IaC orchestration platform for Terraform, OpenTofu, CloudFormation, Pulumi and Kubernetes. Its home page describes drift detection and policy, but no backup or cloud disaster recovery product.
Describes itself as an autonomous cloud control plane with drift detection and cloud asset management. No backup or cloud disaster recovery product is described.
We also left out tools whose recovery features we could not confirm from public pages. If you think a product belongs here, write to editors@cloudresiliencevendors.com with a public source.
Who should use which type of tool?
You already back up data and need the infrastructure back. Firefly, ControlMonkey or Commvault Cloud Rewind. Firefly if you want the recovered state as Terraform you keep; ControlMonkey if SaaS configuration (Okta, Entra ID, Cloudflare) matters as much as cloud; Cloud Rewind if you already run Commvault.
You need a tested failover with a known price. Arpio publishes its prices and RPO targets and runs failover tests on demand, on AWS and Azure.
Your main gap is the data. Veeam or Cohesity. Neither rebuilds the surrounding infrastructure in depth; Cohesity's Cloud Rebuild does this for select AWS workloads that are already in Terraform.
Everything is already in Terraform. HCP Terraform can re-apply it, and StackGuardian can codify what is not. Neither is a recovery product, so plan the rebuild, the ordering and the data yourself.
Firefly adds Databricks workspaces to its recovery coverage
Firefly now discovers Databricks resources, codifies them as infrastructure as code on demand and captures workspace configuration on a schedule, so a workspace can be restored to a point in time.
Cohesity introduces Agent Resilience for AI agent infrastructure
Agent Resilience is a Cohesity Data Cloud capability to discover, protect and recover the infrastructure behind AI agents, starting with Amazon Bedrock. It is available to select customers, with general availability targeted for the end of 2026.
Cohesity survey: most cyber recovery plans restore systems, not operations
A Vanson Bourne survey of 3,200 IT and security decision-makers, commissioned by Cohesity, found that 78% of organizations focus cyber recovery on restoring systems rather than keeping business operations running.
What is the best cloud disaster recovery tool for infrastructure in 2026?
On our weights, Firefly (73.5 out of 100), followed by Arpio (71.1) and Commvault Cloud Rewind (70.7). The gap is small and the order changes with your priorities: if data protection or published pricing matter most, Arpio or a backup platform will fit better.
Is cloud backup the same as cloud disaster recovery?
No. Backup copies data. Cloud disaster recovery brings a working service back, which needs the infrastructure and configuration around that data as well: networks, identity, DNS, load balancers and dependencies. See our explainer on backup vs infrastructure recovery. Cloud backup vs infrastructure recovery.
Can Terraform alone be my cloud disaster recovery plan?
Only for the resources already in Terraform, and only if you have designed and tested the rebuild. HCP Terraform keeps state history and detects drift in its Standard and Premium editions, but it has no recovery workflow or data protection. That is why it ranks seventh here.
Which vendors publish their prices?
Arpio publishes all three tiers (from $12k a year single-cloud). Firefly publishes its Essential tier ($2,499 a month billed annually) but prices Backup and DR in Enterprise on request. Veeam publishes its SaaS rate ($42 per TB per month). Commvault Cloud Rewind and Cohesity are Contact sales.